Publications
Below you will find a list containing publications written or edited by members of staff at the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy.
Lists of publications for the individual members of staff at the Centre can be found in the staff profiles. The profiles are accessible via the Centre's staff list - click at the name of a member of staff and the profile will appear.
Piekkola, H., Bloch, C. W., Redek, T. & Rybalka, M. (2022). Productivity growth and the intangible divide. In Achieving growth that matters Časnik Finance, Slovenia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357578408_PRODUCTIVITY_GROWTH_AND_THE_INTANGIBLE_DIVIDE
Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., Sainte-Marie, M. & Larivière, V. (2020). Who are the acknowledgees? An analysis of gender and academic status. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 582-598. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00036
Ovseiko, P. V. & Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Building an evidence base on organisational interventions to advance women in healthcare leadership. EClinicalMedicine, 39, Article 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101108
O'Connor, P., Hodgins, M., Woods, D. R., Wallwaey, E., Palmen, R., Van Den Brink, M. & Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Organisational characteristics that facilitate gender-based violence and harassment in Higher Education? Administrative Sciences, 11(4), Article 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040138
Nielsen, M. W. & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), Article e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118
Nielsen, M. W., Baker, C. F., Brady, E., Petersen, M. B. & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts. eLife, 10, Article e64561. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64561
Nicolaisen, P. B. (2022). A State of Emergency or Business as Usual in Climate Science Communication? A Three-Dimensional Perspective on the Role Perceptions of Climate Scientists, Climate Journalists, and Citizens. Science Communication, 44(6), 667-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221136220
Nedeva, M., Tirado, M. M. & Thomas, D. A. (2023). Research Governance and the Dynamics of Science: A Framework for the Study of Governance Effects on Research Fields. Research Evaluation, 32(1), 116-127. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac028
Mejlgaard, N., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Kavouras, P., Allum, N., Bendtsen, A-K., Charitidis, C., Claesen, N., Dierickx, K., Domaradzka, A., Elizondo, A., Foeger, N., Hiney , M., Kaltenbrunner, W., Labib, K., Marušić, A., Sørensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Scepanovic, R. ... Veltri, G. (2020). Research Integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature, 586(7829), 358-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8
Madsen, E. B. & Aagaard, K. (2020). Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1159-1181. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00077
Madsen, E. B., Nielsen, M. W., Bjørnholm, J., Jagsi, R. & Andersen, J. P. (2022). Meta-Research: Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19. eLife, 11, Article e76559. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559
Losi, L. F. (2023). Who engages with science, and how? An empirical typology of Europeans’ science engagement. Public Understanding of Science, 32(6), 798-814. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231164340
Laudel, G., Thomas, D. A. & Ramos-Vielba, I. (2022). Hunting or gathering; feasting or starving? Researcher funding acquisition practices in differing funding landscapes. Paper presented at Building capacity and promoting resilience in research systems, Stockholm, Sweden.
Larsen, M-T., Ramos-Vielba, I., Bloch, C. W. & Conradsen, M. L. (2022). The emergence of open science models for university–industry collaboration. Forskningspolitikk, 2022(1), 32-33. https://www.fpol.no/the-emergence-of-open-science-models-for-university-industry-collaboration/
Lambert, M. (2023). Ritual and Affect in Europe Day Celebrations: Institutional Practices of European Identity Construction in Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(5), 1394-1409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13470
Labib, K., Evans, N., Roje, R., Kavouras, P., Reyes Elizondo, A., Kaltenbrunner, W., Buljan, I., Ravn, T., Widdershoven, G., Bouter, L., Charitidis, C., Sørensen, M. P. & Tijdink, J. (2022). Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study. Science and Public Policy, 49(2), 246-266. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab077
Kladakis, A., Aagaard, K. & Hansen, J. (2022). Maneuvering through a Changing Funding Terrain: Biomedical University Scientists in Positive and Negative Feedback Loops. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 8(2), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2022.959
Khurana, M. P. & Madsen, E. B. (2023). Perspectives on the narrowing and clustering of research trajectories: an epistemic threat to medical progress? Science and Public Policy, 50(3), 559-563. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac074
Kavouras, P., Sørensen, M. P. & Mejlgaard, N. (2020). D 2.2: Analysis and Strategy for Dissemination. Aarhus Universitet.
Karaulova, M., Nedeva, M. & Thomas, D. A. (2020). Mapping research fields using co-nomination: the case of hyper-authorship heavy flavour physics. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2229-2249. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03538-x
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Graversen, E. K. (2020). Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, Article 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101750
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2022). Diversity in Diversity Policy: the case of the Scandinavian countries. Human Resource Development International, 25(1), 76-86. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1681850
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Eklund, C. M. (2020). Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences - Final Report on Monitoring and Assessment of RRI Action Plans in six European Research Organisations.
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Bührer, S. (2020). Integrating context in the evaluation of gender equality interventions and beyond. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 51, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2020.490
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Link Horizon Europe funding to real steps to gender equality. Nature, 584(7822), 525. Article 525. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02430-1
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions. EClinicalMedicine, 28, Article 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100623
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Rethinking research funding in pandemic times. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S2), 415-418. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12601
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Palmén, R. & Bührer, S. (2023). Policy-making and evaluation of gender equality programmes: context, power and resistance in the transformation process. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 206-218. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac064
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). What is Gender-sensitive Evaluation and how can this approach support RRI sustainable transformation? https://resbiosproject.medium.com/what-is-gender-sensitive-evaluation-and-how-can-this-approach-support-rri-sustainable-3f6a76b22b2c
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2023). Creating a developmental framework for evaluating RRI implementation in research organisations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100, Article 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102350
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Verzola, A. & Graversen, E. K. (2022). Exploring the potential of citizen science: science transformation through citizen involvement in health, conservation and energy research. Proceedings of Science, 418, Article 051. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.418.0051
Hylmö , A., Steffy, K., Langfeldt, L. & Thomas, D. A. (2022). The quality landscape of economics: Beyond the Top Five. Abstract from Unsettling Research Quality, Oslo, Norway.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). The Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies. Abstract from PEERE International conference on Peer Review, Valencia, Spain.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). The editorial process; How and why do commercial publishers innovate?. Abstract from EASST/4S annual meeting, virPrague, Prag, Czech Republic.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic. Research Evaluation, 30(3), 231-239. Article rvaa037. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa037
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Playing the good cop. Research Europe, 536, 11. https://www.researchprofessional.com/0/rr/news/europe/views-of-europe/2021/3/Reviewers-of-Covid-papers-play-the-good-cop.html
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Pandemic publishing: Changes in journal peer review in times of the Covid-19 pandemic. Abstract from Nordic STS conference 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.tilmeld.dk/nosts2021/program
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Disentangling the Local Context. Abstract from ECPR General Conference, Innsbruck, Austria.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021, Feb 10). How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/02/10/how-the-pandemic-changed-editorial-peer-review-and-why-we-should-wonder-whether-thats-desirable/
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Partial lottery can make grant allocation more fair, more efficient, and more diverse. Science and Public Policy, 49(4), 580–582. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac009
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Oude Maatman, F., Halffman, W. & Hepkema, W. (2022). Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations. Research Evaluation, 31(3), 321-325. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac016
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Hiney, M., Kavouras, P., Mejlgaard, N., Allum, N., Aubert Bonn, N., Bendtsen, A-K., Charitidis, C. A., Claesen, N., Dierickx, K., Domaradzka, A., Elizondo, A. R., Föger, N., Kaltenbrunner, W., Konach, T., Labib, K., Marušić, A. ... Tijdink, J. K. (2022). Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders. PLoS Biology, 20(8), e3001773. Article e3001773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001773
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schneider, J. W. & Sainte-Marie, M. (2022). Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4), Article 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101332
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. K. & Bouter, L. (2022). Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications. Royal Society Open Science, 9(10), Article 220750. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220750
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2022, Oct 31). Reflections on guest editing a Frontiers journal. Leiden Madtrics. https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/reflections-on-guest-editing-a-frontiers-journal
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Ross-Hellauer, T. & Waltman, L. (2022, Nov 18). Sunlight not shadows: Double-anonymised peer review is not the answer to status bias. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/11/18/sunlight-not-shadows-double-anonymised-peer-review-is-not-the-answer-to-status-bias/
Holtrop, T., Meijer, I., Ootero-hermida, P., Amanatidis, A., Buongiovanni, C., Casale, D., Colonnello, C., Deserti, A., Feudo, F., Hartman, A., Hörlesberger, M., Ipolyi, I. M., Nguyen, N., Nieminen, M., Quinti, G., Ravn, T., Rizzo, F., Schmittinger, F., Steinhaus, N. ... Yaghmaei, E. (2022). Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 53, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544
Holmberg, T. T., Sainte-Marie, M., Jensen, E. K., Linnet, J., Runge, E., Lichtenstein, M. B. & Tarp, K. (2022). An analysis of patient motivation for seeking online treatment for binge eating disorder—A mixed methods study combining systematic text condensation with sentiment analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 969115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.969115
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). Exploring linkages between organisational culture and gender equality work: An ethnography of a multinational engineering company. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, Article 101791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101791
