Publications
Below you will find a list containing publications written or edited by members of staff at the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy.
Lists of publications for the individual members of staff at the Centre can be found in the staff profiles. The profiles are accessible via the Centre's staff list - click at the name of a member of staff and the profile will appear.
Ramos-Vielba, I. & D'Este, P. (2023). Women scientists in knowledge exchanges with nonacademic actors: participation gap and emerging gender patterns. Studies in Higher Education, 48(5), 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2196530
Piekkola, H., Bloch, C. W., Redek, T. & Rybalka, M. (2022). Productivity growth and the intangible divide. In Achieving growth that matters Časnik Finance, Slovenia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357578408_PRODUCTIVITY_GROWTH_AND_THE_INTANGIBLE_DIVIDE
Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., Sainte-Marie, M. & Larivière, V. (2020). Who are the acknowledgees? An analysis of gender and academic status. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 582-598. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00036
Ovseiko, P. V. & Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Building an evidence base on organisational interventions to advance women in healthcare leadership. EClinicalMedicine, 39, [101108]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101108
O'Connor, P., Hodgins, M., Woods, D. R., Wallwaey, E., Palmen, R., Van Den Brink, M. & Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Organisational characteristics that facilitate gender-based violence and harassment in Higher Education? Administrative Sciences, 11(4), [138]. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040138
Nielsen, M. W. & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), [e2012208118]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118
Nielsen, M. W., Baker, C. F., Brady, E., Petersen, M. B. & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts. eLife, 10, [e64561]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64561
Nicolaisen, P. B. (2022). A State of Emergency or Business as Usual in Climate Science Communication? A Three-Dimensional Perspective on the Role Perceptions of Climate Scientists, Climate Journalists, and Citizens. Science Communication, 44(6), 667-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221136220
Mejlgaard, N., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Kavouras, P., Allum, N., Bendtsen, A-K., Charitidis, C., Claesen, N., Dierickx, K., Domaradzka, A., Elizondo, A., Foeger, N., Hiney , M., Kaltenbrunner, W., Labib, K., Marušić, A., Sørensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Scepanovic, R. ... Veltri, G. (2020). Research Integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature, 586, 358-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8
Madsen, E. B. & Aagaard, K. (2020). Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00077
Madsen, E. B., Nielsen, M. W., Bjørnholm, J., Jagsi, R. & Andersen, J. P. (2022). Meta-Research: Author-level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID-19. eLife, 11, [e76559]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76559
Laudel, G., Thomas, D. A. & Ramos-Vielba, I. (2022). Hunting or gathering; feasting or starving? Researcher funding acquisition practices in differing funding landscapes. Paper presented at Building capacity and promoting resilience in research systems, Stockholm, Sweden.
Larsen, M-T., Ramos-Vielba, I., Bloch, C. W. & Conradsen, M. L. (2022). The emergence of open science models for university–industry collaboration. Forskningspolitikk, 2022(1), 32-33. https://www.fpol.no/the-emergence-of-open-science-models-for-university-industry-collaboration/
Labib, K., Evans, N., Roje, R., Kavouras, P., Reyes Elizondo, A., Kaltenbrunner, W., Buljan, I., Ravn, T., Widdershoven, G., Bouter, L., Charitidis, C., Sørensen, M. P. & Tijdink, J. (2022). Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study. Science and Public Policy, 49(2), 246-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab077
Kladakis, A., Aagaard, K. & Hansen, J. (2022). Maneuvering through a Changing Funding Terrain: Biomedical University Scientists in Positive and Negative Feedback Loops. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 8(2), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2022.959
Kavouras, P., Sørensen, M. P. & Mejlgaard, N. (2020). D 2.2: Analysis and Strategy for Dissemination. Aarhus Universitet.
Karaulova, M., Nedeva, M. & Thomas, D. A. (2020). Mapping research fields using co-nomination: the case of hyper-authorship heavy flavour physics. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2229-2249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03538-x
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Graversen, E. K. (2020). Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, [101750]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101750
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2022). Diversity in Diversity Policy: the case of the Scandinavian countries. Human Resource Development International, 25(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1681850
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Eklund, C. M. (2020). Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences - Final Report on Monitoring and Assessment of RRI Action Plans in six European Research Organisations.
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Bührer, S. (2020). Integrating context in the evaluation of gender equality interventions and beyond. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 51, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2020.490
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Link Horizon Europe funding to real steps to gender equality. Nature, 584, [525]. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02430-1
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions. EClinicalMedicine, 28, [100623]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100623
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Rethinking research funding in pandemic times. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S2), 415-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12601
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). What is Gender-sensitive Evaluation and how can this approach support RRI sustainable transformation? https://resbiosproject.medium.com/what-is-gender-sensitive-evaluation-and-how-can-this-approach-support-rri-sustainable-3f6a76b22b2c
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Verzola, A. & Graversen, E. K. (2022). Exploring the potential of citizen science: science transformation through citizen involvement in health, conservation and energy research. Proceedings of Science, 418, [051]. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.418.0051
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). Exploring linkages between organisational culture and gender equality work: An ethnography of a multinational engineering company. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, [101791]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101791
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). Networking Fatigue, Self-Care and JOMO* in International Research Exchange (*the joy of missing out). M@n@gement, 23(1), 120-124. https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/4467/10235
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). Motivation, organisational gender equality work and the postfeminist gender regime: A feminist approach. Forlaget Politica. https://politica.dk/politicas-phd-serie/ea-hoeg-utoft/
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). ‘All the single ladies’ as the ideal academic during times of COVID-19? Gender, Work and Organization, 27(5), 778-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12478
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism by Catherine Rottenberg; Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny by Sarah Banet-Weiser. Signs, 46(1), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1086/709246
Høg Utoft, E. (2021). Maneuvering within postfeminism: A study of gender equality practitioners in Danish academia. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(1), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12556
Høg Utoft, E. (2020, Sept 14). Motivation, organisational gender equality work and the postfeminist gender regime: A feminist approach. (2 ed.) Dansk Sociologforening.
Høg Utoft, E., Bendtsen, A-K. & Soendergaard, M. K. (2021). A lack of mess? On navigating becoming an online ethnographer. Paper presented at CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Japan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350763622_A_lack_of_mess_On_navigating_becoming_an_online_ethnographer
Høg Utoft, E. (2021). Sexism and Sexual Harassment in Danish Academia: Looking Back and Gazing Forward. Forskningspolitikk, 44(2), 30-32.
Høg Utoft, E., Søndergaard, M. K. & Bendtsen, A-K. (2022). A lack of mess? Advice on undertaking video-mediated participant observations. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 11(3), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-07-2021-0037
Hylmö , A., Steffy, K., Langfeldt, L. & Thomas, D. A. (2022). The quality landscape of economics: Beyond the Top Five. Abstract from Unsettling Research Quality, Oslo, Norway.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). The Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies. Abstract from PEERE International conference on Peer Review, Valencia, Spain.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). The editorial process; How and why do commercial publishers innovate?. Abstract from EASST/4S annual meeting, virPrague, Prag, Czech Republic.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic. Research Evaluation, 30(3), 231-239. [rvaa037]. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa037
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Playing the good cop. Research Europe, 536, 11. https://www.researchprofessional.com/0/rr/news/europe/views-of-europe/2021/3/Reviewers-of-Covid-papers-play-the-good-cop.html
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Pandemic publishing: Changes in journal peer review in times of the Covid-19 pandemic. Abstract from Nordic STS conference 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.tilmeld.dk/nosts2021/program
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Disentangling the Local Context. Abstract from ECPR General Conference, Innsbruck, Austria.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021, Feb 10). How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/02/10/how-the-pandemic-changed-editorial-peer-review-and-why-we-should-wonder-whether-thats-desirable/
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Partial lottery can make grant allocation more fair, more efficient, and more diverse. Science and Public Policy, 49(4), 580–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac009
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Oude Maatman, F., Halffman, W. & Hepkema, W. (2022). Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations. Research Evaluation, 31(3), 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac016
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Hiney, M., Kavouras, P., Mejlgaard, N., Allum, N., Aubert Bonn, N., Bendtsen, A-K., Charitidis, C. A., Claesen, N., Dierickx, K., Domaradzka, A., Elizondo, A. R., Föger, N., Kaltenbrunner, W., Konach, T., Labib, K., Marušić, A. ... Tijdink, J. K. (2022). Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders. PLoS Biology, 20(8), e3001773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001773
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schneider, J. W. & Sainte-Marie, M. (2022). Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4), [101332]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101332
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. K. & Bouter, L. (2022). Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications. Royal Society Open Science, 9(10), [220750]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220750
