Publications
Below you will find a list containing publications written or edited by members of staff at the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy.
Lists of publications for the individual members of staff at the Centre can be found in the staff profiles. The profiles are accessible via the Centre's staff list - click at the name of a member of staff and the profile will appear.
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Graversen, E. K. (2020). Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, Article 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101750
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2022). Diversity in Diversity Policy: the case of the Scandinavian countries. Human Resource Development International, 25(1), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1681850
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Eklund, C. M. (2020). Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences - Final Report on Monitoring and Assessment of RRI Action Plans in six European Research Organisations.
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Bührer, S. (2020). Integrating context in the evaluation of gender equality interventions and beyond. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 51, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2020.490
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Link Horizon Europe funding to real steps to gender equality. Nature, 584(7822), 525. Article 525. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02430-1
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions. EClinicalMedicine, 28, Article 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100623
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). Rethinking research funding in pandemic times. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S2), 415-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12601
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Palmén, R. & Bührer, S. (2023). Policy-making and evaluation of gender equality programmes: context, power and resistance in the transformation process. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac064
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2021). What is Gender-sensitive Evaluation and how can this approach support RRI sustainable transformation? https://resbiosproject.medium.com/what-is-gender-sensitive-evaluation-and-how-can-this-approach-support-rri-sustainable-3f6a76b22b2c
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2023). Creating a developmental framework for evaluating RRI implementation in research organisations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 100, Article 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102350
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Graversen, E. K. & Svendsen, A. D. (2022). Responsible research and innovation grounding practices in Biosciences: Summative Evaluation Report.
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Verzola, A. & Graversen, E. K. (2022). Exploring the potential of citizen science: science transformation through citizen involvement in health, conservation and energy research. Proceedings of Science, 418, Article 051. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.418.0051
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Pedersen, A. V. (2025). Beyond Policy: The Odyssey of Implementing GEPs in European Academia. Social Inclusion, 13, Article 9876. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.9876
Hylmö , A., Steffy, K., Langfeldt, L. & Thomas, D. A. (2022). The quality landscape of economics: Beyond the Top Five. Abstract from Unsettling Research Quality, Oslo, Norway.
Hosseini, M., Senabre Hidalgo, E., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Güttinger, S. & Penders, B. (2024). Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values. Accountability in Research, 31(5), 428-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625
Hosseini, M. & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5
Hosseini, M. & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023, May 25). Using AI in peer review. Research Professional. https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-views-of-europe-2023-5-using-ai-in-peer-review/
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). The Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies. Abstract from PEERE International conference on Peer Review, Valencia, Spain.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). The editorial process; How and why do commercial publishers innovate?. Abstract from EASST/4S annual meeting, virPrague, Prag, Czech Republic.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic. Research Evaluation, 30(3), 231-239. Article rvaa037. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa037
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Playing the good cop. Research Europe, 536, 11. https://www.researchprofessional.com/0/rr/news/europe/views-of-europe/2021/3/Reviewers-of-Covid-papers-play-the-good-cop.html
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Pandemic publishing: Changes in journal peer review in times of the Covid-19 pandemic. Abstract from Nordic STS conference 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.tilmeld.dk/nosts2021/program
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021). Disentangling the Local Context. Abstract from ECPR General Conference, Innsbruck, Austria.
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021, Feb 10). How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/02/10/how-the-pandemic-changed-editorial-peer-review-and-why-we-should-wonder-whether-thats-desirable/
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Partial lottery can make grant allocation more fair, more efficient, and more diverse. Science and Public Policy, 49(4), 580–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac009
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Oude Maatman, F., Halffman, W. & Hepkema, W. (2022). Automated citation recommendation tools encourage questionable citations. Research Evaluation, 31(3), 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac016
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Hiney, M., Kavouras, P., Mejlgaard, N., Allum, N., Aubert Bonn, N., Bendtsen, A.-K., Charitidis, C. A., Claesen, N., Dierickx, K., Domaradzka, A., Elizondo, A. R., Föger, N., Kaltenbrunner, W., Konach, T., Labib, K., Marušić, A. ... Tijdink, J. K. (2022). Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders. PLoS Biology, 20(8), e3001773. Article e3001773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001773
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schneider, J. W. & Sainte-Marie, M. (2022). Ungendered writing: Writing styles are unlikely to account for gender differences in funding rates in the natural and technical sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 16(4), Article 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101332
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. K. & Bouter, L. (2022). Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications. Royal Society Open Science, 9(10), Article 220750. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220750
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2022, Oct 31). Reflections on guest editing a Frontiers journal. Leiden Madtrics. https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/reflections-on-guest-editing-a-frontiers-journal
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Reid, A., Bidoglia, M., Gaskell, G., Aubert-Bonn, N., Buljan, I., Fuglsang, S., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Kavouras, P., Marušić, A., Mejlgaard, N., Pizzolato, D., Roje, R., Tijdink, J. & Veltri, G. (2022). Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/fgy7c
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Ross-Hellauer, T. & Waltman, L. (2022, Nov 18). Sunlight not shadows: Double-anonymised peer review is not the answer to status bias. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/11/18/sunlight-not-shadows-double-anonymised-peer-review-is-not-the-answer-to-status-bias/
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Tijdink, J. & Bouter, L. M. (2023, Jan 10). The next frontier in open science: transparency in funding processes. Royal Society London. https://royalsociety.org/blog/2022/12/transparency-in-funding-processes/
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2022). 1‘Conditional Acceptance’ (additional experiments required): A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/r6t8p
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Bouter, L. & Tijdink, J. (2023). Opinion: A Call for Open Funding Procedures. The Scientist, 2023(February). https://www.the-scientist.com/critic-at-large/opinion-a-call-for-open-funding-procedures-70903
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2587766/v1
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Understanding the social and political dimensions of research (er) assessment: Interpretative flexibility and hidden criteria. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e5uyv
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Sørensen, M. P., Allum, N. & Reid, A.-K. (2023). Disentangling the local context—imagined communities and researchers’ sense of belonging. Science and Public Policy, 50(4), 695-706. Article scad017. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad017
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Integrity and Open Science for Public Trust in Science? Not self-evident!. Abstract from 6th NordicSTS conference, Oslo, Norway. https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/english/research/news-and-events/events/conferences/2023/nordic-sts/panels/universities-and-grand-challenges.html
Horbach, S. P. J. M. & Hosseini, M. (2023, Sept 26). Can generative AI add anything to academic peer review? LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/09/26/can-generative-ai-add-anything-to-academic-peer-review/
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023, Sept 26). This Peer Review Week, PLOS looks ahead to a future of cooperation and collaboration at all levels of scholarship and scholarly communications. Public Library of Science (PLoS). https://theplosblog.plos.org/2023/09/future-of-collaboration/
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). 1Through the Secret Gate: A Study of Member-Contributed Submissions in PNAS. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/d62c8
Horbach, S. P. J. M., Fishberg, R., Ulpts, S. A. & Degn, L. (2024). Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1), Article 2414500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414500
Holtrop, T., Meijer, I., Ootero-hermida, P., Amanatidis, A., Buongiovanni, C., Casale, D., Colonnello, C., Deserti, A., Feudo, F., Hartman, A., Hörlesberger, M., Ipolyi, I. M., Nguyen, N., Nieminen, M., Quinti, G., Ravn, T., Rizzo, F., Schmittinger, F., Steinhaus, N. ... Yaghmaei, E. (2022). Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 53, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544
Holmberg, T. T., Sainte-Marie, M., Jensen, E. K., Linnet, J., Runge, E., Lichtenstein, M. B. & Tarp, K. (2022). An analysis of patient motivation for seeking online treatment for binge eating disorder—A mixed methods study combining systematic text condensation with sentiment analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 969115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.969115
Holding, B. C., Acciai, C., Schneider, J. W. & Nielsen, M. W. (2024). Quantifying the mover’s advantage: transatlantic migration, employment prestige, and scientific performance. Higher Education, 87(6), 1749-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01089-7
Høg Utoft, E. (2020). Exploring linkages between organisational culture and gender equality work: An ethnography of a multinational engineering company. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, Article 101791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101791
