Kerry, N., Al-Shawaf, L., Barbato, M., Batres, C., Blake, K. R., Cha, Y., Chauvin, G. V., Clifton, J. D. W., Fernandez, A. M., Galbarczyk, A., Ghossainy, M. E., Jang, D., Jasienska, G., Karasawa, M., Laustsen, L., Loria, R., Luberti, F., Moran, J., Pavlovic, Z. ... Murray, D. R. (2022). Experimental and cross-cultural evidence that parenthood and parental care motives increase social conservatism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1982), [20220978]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0978

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2022). Forgiving the mote in your sister's eye: On Standingless Forgiveness. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 23(2), 248-272. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v23i2.1957

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. & Albertsen, A. (2022). Forklaringer i videnskaben. In S. F. Midtgaard & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), Videnskabsteorien i grundrids: for samfundsvidenskaberne (pp. 405-436). Djøf Forlag.

Pedersen, V. M. L. (2022). Freeze the Biological Clock: Discrimination, Disrespect, and Fertility Preservation via Social Freezing. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 39(3), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12572

Gothreau, C., Arceneaux, K. & Friesen, A. (2022). Hostile, Benevolent, Implicit: How Different Shades of Sexism Impact Gendered Policy Attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, [817309]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.817309/full

Albertsen, A. (2022). How do the characteristics of voting advice application users change over time? Evidence from the German Election Studies. German Politics, 31(3), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2020.1830374

Thomsen, L. (2022). How do we know who may replace each other in triadic conflict roles? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, [e124]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21001473

Pedersen, V. M. L. (2022). In Defense of Intentionally Shaping People's Choices. Political Research Quarterly, 75(4), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211069974

Pfattheicher, S., Petersen, M. B. & Böhm, R. (2022). Information about herd immunity through vaccination and empathy promote COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Health Psychology, 41(2), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001096

Laustsen, L. & Olsen, A. L. (2022). Is a Disease Leader Attractive? Six Tests of whether the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Follower Preferences for Attractiveness, Health and other Traits in Political and Non-Political Leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(6), [101574]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101574

Eftedal, N. H., Kleppestø, T. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Røysamb, E., Vassend, O., Ystrom, E. & Thomsen, L. (2022). Justice sensitivity is undergirded by separate heritable motivations to be morally principled and opportunistic. Scientific Reports, 12(1), [5402]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09253-2

Gothreau, C., Warren, C. & Schneider, S. (2022). Looking the other way: how ideology influences perceptions of sexual harassment. European Journal of Politics and Gender. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16445951244136

Rees, F., Geiger, M., Lilleholt, L., Zettler, I., Betsch, C., Böhm, R. & Wilhelm, O. (2022). Measuring parents’ readiness to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19. Vaccine, 40(28), 3825-3834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.091

Geiger, M., Rees, F., Lilleholt, L., Santana, A. P., Zettler, I., Wilhelm, O., Betsch, C. & Böhm, R. (2022). Measuring the 7Cs of Vaccination Readiness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(4), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000663

Van Bavel, J. J., Cichocka, A., Capraro, V., Sjåstad, H., Nezlek, J. B., Pavlović, T., Alfano, M., Gelfand, M. J., Azevedo, F., Birtel, M. D., Cislak, A., Lockwood, P. L., Ross, R. M., Abts, K., Agadullina, E., Aruta, J. J. B., Besharati, S. N., Bor, A., Choma, B. L. ... Boggio, P. S. (2022). National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic. Nature Communications, 13(1), [517]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27668-9

Jørgensen, F., Bor, A., Rasmussen, M. S., Lindholt, M. F. & Petersen, M. B. (2022). Pandemic fatigue fueled political discontent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(48), [e2201266119]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201266119

Delton, A. W., Kane, J. V., Petersen, M. B., Robertson, T. E. & Cosmides, L. (2022). Partisans use emotions as social pressure: Feeling anger and gratitude at exiters and recruits in political groups. Party Politics, 28(5), 845-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211018796

Marie, A. & Petersen, M. B. (2022). Political conspiracy theories as tools for mobilization and signaling. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, [101440]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101440

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2022). Praising Without Standing. Journal of Ethics, 26(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-021-09374-2

Pavlović, T., Azevedo, F., De, K., Riaño-Moreno, J. C., Maglić, M., Gkinopoulos, T., Donnelly-Kehoe, P. A., Payán-Gómez, C., Huang, G., Kantorowicz, J., Birtel, M. D., Schönegger, P., Capraro, V., Santamaría-García, H., Yucel, M., Ibanez, A., Rathje, S., Wetter, E., Stanojević, D. ... Van Bavel, J. J. (2022). Predicting attitudinal and behavioral responses to COVID-19 pandemic using machine learning. PNAS Nexus, 1(3), [pgac093]. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac093

Leuffen, D., Schüssler, J. & Gómez Díaz, J. (2022). Public support for differentiated integration: individual liberal values and concerns about member state discrimination. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(2), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1829005

Schüssler, J., Dinesen, P. T., Østergaard, S. D. & Sønderskov, K. M. (2022). Public support for unequal treatment of unvaccinated citizens: Evidence from Denmark. Social Science & Medicine, 305, [115101]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115101

Albertsen, A. (2022). Rare diseases in healthcare priority setting: should rarity matter? Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(9), 624-628. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106978

Vistisen, H. T., Sønderskov, K. M., Dinesen, P. T., Brund, R. B. K., Nielsen, R. Ø. & Østergaard, S. D. (2022). Running on empty: a longitudinal global study of psychological well-being among runners during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open, 12(9), [e063455]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063455

Kaufmann, T., Lilleholt, L., Böhm, R., Zettler, I. & Heck, D. W. (2022). Sensitive attitudes and adherence to recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparing direct and indirect questioning techniques. Personality and Individual Differences, 190, [111525]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111525

Jørgensen, F. & Petersen, M. B. (2022). Smittebeskyttende adfærd under anden bølge af covid-19 pandemien i Danmark. Politica. Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab, 54(4), 343-363. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i4.134832

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2022). The Benefits of Injustice and Its Correction: A Challenge to the Duty Not to Benefit Innocently from Injustice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(3), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12263

Räsänen, J. & Smajdor, A. (2022). The Complex case of Ellie Anderson. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(4), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106998

Bor, A. & Petersen, M. B. (2022). The Psychology of Online Political Hostility: A Comprehensive, Cross-National Test of the Mismatch Hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885

Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D., Laustsen, L., Smith, K. & Petersen, M. B. (2022). The Psychophysiology of Political Ideology: Replications, Reanalyses, and Recommendations. Journal of Politics, 84(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1086/714780

Zettler, I., Schild, C., Lilleholt, L., Kroencke, L., Utesch, T., Moshagen, M., Bohm, R., Back, M. D. & Geukes, K. (2022). The Role of Personality in COVID-19-Related Perceptions, Evaluations, and Behaviors: Findings Across Five Samples, Nine Traits, and 17 Criteria. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001680

Fonn, E. K., Zahl, J. H. & Thomsen, L. (2022). The boss is not always right: Norwegian preschoolers do not selectively endorse the testimony of a novel dominant agent. Child Development, 93(3), 831-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13722