Resource Possession in the Mind’s Eye: Ideological Convergence and Divergence in the Perceptions of Poor People
New publication by Wilson N. Merrell, Lei Fan and Lotte Thomsen in collaboration with Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington (London School of Economics and NYU Abu Dhabi) in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
In this UK-based study, Merrell, Fan, Thomsen, and Sheehy-Skeffington return to foundational questions in research on intergroup inequality and social dominance theory. Using a reverse correlation method, they examine the mental representations people form when thinking about individuals who possess resources versus those who lack them.
Merrell, W., Fan, L., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., & Thomsen, L. (2025). Resource Possession in the Mind’s Eye: Ideological Convergence and Divergence in the Perceptions of Poor People. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251371787
Abstract
Social hierarchies ultimately concern resource possession, yet psychological processes for regulating resource-related tensions remain underexplored. We examine how support for intergroup equality (egalitarianism) relates to explicit attitudes toward, and mental images of, the resource poor. In Study 1 (N = 625), egalitarians report more favorable attitudes toward the resource poor than anti-egalitarians. However, using the reverse correlation paradigm, both groups generate similarly negative mental images of this group, as shown by pixel luminance comparisons (Study 1) and evaluated by independent raters of person-perceptual (Study 2, N = 394) and coalitional traits (Study 3, N = 348). While ideology did not shape image generation, it did influence image evaluation: egalitarian raters showed less polarization between resource-poor and resource-rich faces than anti-egalitarian raters. These findings suggest that despite ideological differences in explicit attitudes (divergence), egalitarians, and anti-egalitarians share similarly negative mental representations (convergence) of the resource poor, highlighting a nuanced interplay between social perception and hierarchy regulation.