Publications
Sort by:
Date
Bækgaard, M., Moynihan, D. P. & Thomsen, M. K. (2021). Why Do Policymakers Support Administrative Burdens? The Roles of Deservingness, Political Ideology, and Personal Experience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa033
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. & Bengtson, A. (2021). Why the all affected principle is groundless. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 18(6), 571-596. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20213473
Munch, L. A. (2021). Why ‘Negative Control’ is a Dead End: A Reply to Mainz and Uhrenfeldt. Res Publica, 27(4), 661-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-021-09507-2
Sejersen, M. (2021). Winning hearts and minds with economic sanctions? Evidence from a survey experiment in Venezuela. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(1), [oraa008]. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa008
Green-Pedersen, C. & Little, C. (2021). Without enemies, without friends. Morality policies, the Roman Catholic Church, and Ireland’s ‘secular’ party system. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(9), 1391-1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1785530
Cecchini, M. (2021). “I can go teach for 30 minutes, and then I can tell” – The risk work of teachers in Danish secondary schools. Health, Risk & Society, 23(5-6), 236-250 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2021.1948976
Lindekilde, L., Pearce, J., Parker, D. & Rogers, B. (2021). “Run, Hide, Tell” or “Run, Hide, Fight”? The impact of diverse public guidance about marauding terrorist firearms attacks on behavioral intentions during a scenario-based experiment in the United Kingdom and Denmark. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60, [102278]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102278
Hansen, L. S. (2021). “That’s the System”: An Ethnographic and Theoretical Account of Bureaucratic Decoupling in Welfare Encounters. Forlaget Politica. Politicas ph.d.-serie https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/Afhandlinger/lsh.pdf
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2020). "Would have died soon anyway". The Philosophers' Magazine, 90(3), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm20209068
Kölln, A-K. & Polk, J. (2020). A Break in the Representative Chain: Party Members’ Ideological Disagreement with Candidates and Demands for Intra-Party Democracy. In M. Demker, K. Heidar & K. Kosiara-Pedersen (Eds.), Nordic Party Members: Linkages in Troubled Times (pp. 225-243). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Holsting, V. S. & Brænder, M. (2020). A New Spirit of Militarism? Person–Organization Fit and Economies of Worth Among New Military Cadets. In K. K. Hachey, T. Libel & W. H. Dean (Eds.), Rethinking Military Professionalism for the Changing Armed Forces (pp. 165-188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45570-5_11
Andersen, S. C., Gensowski, M., Ludeke, S. & John, O. P. (2020). A Stable Relationship Between Personality and Academic Performance from Childhood through Adolescence: An original study and replication in hundred-thousand-person samples. Journal of Personality, 88(5), 925-939. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12538
Hansen, J. A. J. & Tummers, L. (2020). A Systematic Review of Field Experiments in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 921-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13181
Mouritzen, P. E. & Opstrup, N. (2020). Academics and Performance Systems. In N. E., C. Greve & S. Pigl-Thingvad (Eds.), Governing the Reformed University (pp. 118-139). Routledge. Routledge Critical Studies in Public Management
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions. EClinicalMedicine, 28, [100623]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100623
Albertsen, A. (2020). Against the family veto in organ procurement: Why the wishes of the dead should prevail when the living and the deceased disagree on organ donation. Bioethics, 34(3), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12661
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. & Petersen, T. S. (2020). Age change, official age and fairness in health. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(9), 634-635. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106078
Petersen, M. B. & Arceneaux, K. (2020). An Intuitionist Theory of Argument Strength in Politics: How Intuitive Cognitive Biases Produce Universally Strong Arguments. Political Psychology, 41(6), 1113-1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12668
Stage, A. K. (2020). Are national university systems becoming more alike? Long-term developments in staff composition across five countries. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 4(1), 68-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2019.1702088
Midtbøen, A. H., Brochmann, G., Erdal, M. B., Kruse, M., Jensen, K. K., Bevelander, P., Mouritsen, P. & Bech, E. C. (2020). Assessments of citizenship criteria: are immigrants more liberal? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(13), 2625-2646. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1756762
Finke, D. (2020). At Loggerheads over State Aid: Why the Commission Rejects Aid and Governments Comply. European Union Politics, 21(3), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520916248
Valbjørn, M. (2020). Be careful what you wish for - The Multiple Strategies of De-Sectarianization. In Challenges to the Middle East North Africa Inclusionary State (pp. 22-27). The Project on Middle East Political Science (POMEPS). POMEPS Studies No. 37 https://pomeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/POMEPS_Studies_37_Web.pdf
Klüser, K. J. (2020). Beyond Portfolios: Bureaucratic Issue Attention in Coalition Governments. Forlaget Politica. Politicas ph.d.-serie https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/Afhandlinger/klueser.pdf
Valbjørn, M. (2020). Beyond the beyond(s): On the (many) third way(s) beyond primordialism and instrumentalism in the study of sectarianism. Nations and Nationalism, 26(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12581
Holtug, N., Lippert-Rasmussen, K., Ryberg, J. & Sandøe, P. (2020). Bioethics research group and beyond: Three decades of studies in ethics and political philosophy. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 53(1), 133-161. https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-bja10011
Green-Pedersen, C. & Skjæveland, A. (2020). Blokpolitik og nye politiske emner: Hvordan går det med samarbejdsmønstrene i Folketinget? . Politica - Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab, 52(3), 311-330. https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/politica_52_3/cgp_og_as.pdf
Gelardi, M. (2020). Blurring Borders: Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security. Alternatives, 45(3), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375420929586
Green-Pedersen, C. (2020). Book Reviews: The Politics of Competence: Parties, Public Opinion and Voters. By Jane Green and Will Jennings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Perspectives on Politics, 18(2), 648-649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720000626
Pedersen, M. J. & Nielsen, V. L. (2020). Bureaucratic decision-making: A multi-method study of gender similarity bias and gender stereotype beliefs. Public Administration, 98(2), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12622
Harste, G. (2020). Business legitimacy, modernity, and organizational systems: corporate spirit, esprit de corps and corpus spiritus throughout history. In J. D. R. (Ed.), Handbook of business legitimacy: responsibility, ethics and society Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_35-1
Rafiqi, A. (2020). Can Muslims be Democratic? Empirical Evidence on the Influence of Muslim Religiosity on Support for Democracy. Forlaget Politica. Politicas ph.d.-serie https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/Afhandlinger/arzoo_rafiqi.pdf
Beach, D. (2020). Case Studies and Process Tracing. In D. Berg-Schlosser, B. Badie & L. Morlino (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Science (pp. 288-304). SAGE Publications.
Hansen, H. F., Lind, J. K. & Stage, A. K. (2020). Changing managerial roles in Danish universities. Science and Public Policy, 47(4), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa025
Thomas, D. A., Nevada, M., Tirado, M. M. & Jacob, M. (2020). Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda. Research Evaluation, 29(3), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa008
Bøggild, T. (2020). Cheater detection in politics: Evolution and citizens’ capacity to hold political leaders accountable. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), [101268]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.006
Bækgaard, M., James, O., Serritzlew, S. & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Citizens’ Motivated Reasoning about Public Performance: Experimental Findings from the US and Denmark. International Public Management Journal, 23(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1659891
Harrits, G. S. & Stubager, R. (2020). Classes and Politics: A Changing Relationship. In P. M. Christiansen, J. Elklit & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics (pp. 242-258). Oxford University Press.
Pedersen, M. K., Díaz, C. M. C., Alba-Marrugo, M. A., Amidi, A., Basaiawmoit, R. V., Bergenholtz, C., Christiansen, M. H., Gajdacz, M., Hertwig, R., Ishkhanyan, B., Klyver, K., Ladegaard, N., Mathiasen, K., Parsons, C., Petersen, M. B., Rafner, J., Villadsen, A. R., Wallentin, M., Sherson, J. F. & players, S. L. (2020). Cognitive Abilities in the Wild: Population-scale game-based cognitive assessment. arXiv.org.
Aarøe, L. & Petersen, M. B. (2020). Cognitive Biases and Communication Strength in Social Networks: The Case of Episodic Frames. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1561-1581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000273
Loftis, M. & Mortensen, P. B. (2020). Collaborating with the Machines: A hybrid method for classifying policy documents. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 184-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12245
Otterbring, T., Mitkidis, P., Aarøe, L. & Elbæk, C. T. (2020). Commentary: Grounded procedures: A proximate mechanism for the psychology of cleansing and other physical actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, [2137]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02137
Chaqués Bonafont, L., Green-Pedersen, C. & Seeberg, H. B. (2020). Comparing agenda-settings: the Comparative Agendas Project. In G. Peters (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis (pp. 90-112). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Madsen, E. B. & Aagaard, K. (2020). Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00077
Aagaard, K., Kladakis, A. & Nielsen, M. W. (2020). Concentration or dispersal of research funding? Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 117-149. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00002, https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00002
Jørgensen, K. E. (2020). Conceptual analytical avenues known and unknown. Global Affairs, 6(4-5), 617-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1858133
Munck, G., Møller, J. & Skaaning, S-E. (2020). Conceptualization and measurement: basic guidelines and distinctions. In L. Curini & R. Franzese (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations (pp. 331-352). SAGE Publications. SAGE Handbook
Christiansen, P. M. (2020). Corporatism: Exaggerated Death Rumours? In P. M. Christiansen, J. Elklit & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics (pp. 160-176). Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M. F. & Svendsen, G. T. (2020). Corruption and Bureaucratic Reforms: “Getting to Denmark”? In P. Munk Christiansen, J. Elklit & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics (pp. 177-192). Oxford University Press.
Thesen, G., Mortensen, P. B. & Green-Pedersen, C. (2020). Cost of Ruling as a Game of Tones: The Accumulation of Bad News and Incumbents’ Vote Loss. European Journal of Political Research, 59(3), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12367
Valbjørn, M. (2020). Countering Sectarianism: The Many Paths, Promises, and Pitfalls of De-sectarianization. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 18(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2020.1729550
