Publications
Below you will find a list containing publications written or edited by members of staff at the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy.
Lists of publications for the individual members of staff at the Centre can be found in the staff profiles. The profiles are accessible via the Centre's staff list - click at the name of a member of staff and the profile will appear.
Ravn, T. (2021). Lived Realities of Solo Motherhood, Donor Conception and Medically Assisted Reproduction. Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781839091155
Wang, J., Halffman, W. & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2024). Listing quality: Chinese journal lists in incoherent valuation regimes. Science and Public Policy, 51(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad052
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Ovseiko, P. V. (2020). Link Horizon Europe funding to real steps to gender equality. Nature, 584(7822), 525. Artikel 525. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02430-1
Degn, L., Selberg, H. & Markussen, A.-L. R. (2022). Learning Without a Teacher: Perceptions of Peer-to-Peer Learning Activities in Simulation Training. I I. Akselbo & I. Aune (red.), How Can we Use Simulation to Improve Competencies in Nursing? (s. 77-89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10399-5
Brady, E., Nielsen, M. W., Andersen, J. P. & Oertelt-Prigione, S. (2021). Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies. Nature Communications, 12, Artikel 4015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24265-8
Ebbrecht, C. K., Fuglsang, S. & Ladegaard, C. W. (2020). Kortlægning af forskningslitteratur om effekter af måder at udøve offentlig ledelse på: Empirisk evidens i en dansk kontekst. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse. https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2021/kortlaegning-af-forskningslitteratur-om-effekter-af-mader-at-udove-offentlig-ledelse-pa
Ebbrecht, C. K. & Baker, C. F. (2020). Kortlægning af evalueringsbaseret litteratur om effekt og effektmåling af offentlige lederuddannelser: Empirisk evidens i en dansk kontekst. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse. https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2021/kortlaegning-af-evalueringsbaseret-litteratur-om-effekt-og-effektmaling-af-offentlige-lederuddannelser
Andersen, J. P. (2025). Kønsproblematikker i forskning - og hvordan det påvirker kvinders sundhed. I Fra sundhedsgab til økonomisk gevinst (s. 10). Molecule Consultancy A/S. https://www.moleculeconsultancy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Hvidbog_Kvinders_Sundhed.pdf
Ulpts, S. A. & Schneider, J. W. (2024). Knowledge production modes: the relevance and feasibility of 'reproducibility'. Abstract fra EASST/4S, Amsterdam, Holland.
Schneider, J. W., Allum, N., Andersen, J. P., Petersen, M. B., Madsen, E. B., Mejlgaard, N. & Zachariae, R. (2024). Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research. PLoS One, 19(8), Artikel e0304342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304342
Fuglsang, S. (2024). Is science for the rich and powerful? Investigating the relation between income and trust in science across 145 countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 36(1), Artikel edad045. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad045
Thomas, D. A. (2022, okt. 24). Is it possible to expand our time horizons? https://bahaiteachings.org/possible-expand-time-horizons/
Bloch, C., Protogerou, A. & Vonortas, N. S. (2024). Introduction: Setting the stage, linking intangible assets to productivity. I C. Bloch, A. Protogerou & N. S. Vonortas (red.), Intangible Assets, Productivity and Economic Growth: Micro, Meso and Macro Perspectives (s. 1-10). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324225-1
Norn, M.-T., Ramos-Vielba, I., Saugstrup, L. I., Ryan, T. K. & Bloch, C. W. (2022). Interim Impact Assessment of the Open Discovery Innovation Network (ODIN): Academic report from the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA), Department of Political Science, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University. https://cfa-research.au.dk/publications/2022/10/2
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Integrity and Open Science for Public Trust in Science? Not self-evident!. Abstract fra 6th NordicSTS conference, Oslo, Norge. https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/english/research/news-and-events/events/conferences/2023/nordic-sts/panels/universities-and-grand-challenges.html
Degn, L. (2020). Integrating Integrity: The Organizational Translation of Policies on Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3167-3182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00262-w
Pedersen, A. V., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Saugstrup, L. I. (2023). Integrating Gender Balance in Circle U. Activities: Contextualizing the Gender Dimension in the Alliance: Deliverable D4.6. Circle U . https://www.circle-u.eu/resources/gender-equality/integrating-gender-balance-in-circle-u-activities.pdf
Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. & Bührer, S. (2020). Integrating context in the evaluation of gender equality interventions and beyond. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 51, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2020.490
Piekkola, H., Bloch, C., Rybalka, M. & Redek, T. (2025). Intangibles From Intangible Capital Work: Their Valuation and Technological Change. Review of Income and Wealth, 71(2), Artikel e70017. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70017
Bloch, C., Roth, F., van Criekingen, K. & Piekkola, H. (2024). Intangibles and their contribution to productivity: An overview. I C. Bloch, A. Protogerou & N. S. Vonortas (red.), Intangible Assets, Productivity and Economic Growth: Micro, Meso and Macro Perspectives (s. 34-55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324225-3
Bloch, C. W., Protogerou, A. & S. Vonortas, N. (red.) (2024). Intangible Assets, Productivity and Economic Growth: Micro, Meso and Macro Perspectives. (1 udg.) Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324225
Piekkola, H., Bloch, C., Rybalka, M. & Redek, T. (2024). Intangible Assets and Productivity: An Occupation-Based Approach. I C. Bloch, A. Protogerou & N. S. Vonortas (red.), Intangible Assets, Productivity and Economic Growth: Micro, Meso and Macro Perspectives (s. 103-127). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324225-6
Acciai, C., Holding, B. C., Schneider, J. W. & Nielsen, M. W. (2022). Institution and gender-related differences in publication speed before and during COVID-19. PLoS One, 17(11 ), Artikel e0277011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277011
Bloch, C., Eklund, C. & Piekkola, H. (2023). Innovative competences, the financial crisis and firm-level productivity in Denmark and Finland. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(2), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2021.1895496
Norn, M.-T., Bloch, C. W., Fuglsang, S., Graversen, E. K. & Povlsen, R. E. (2025). Innovation og iværksætteri på de danske universiteter: Mulige indikatorer til UFS’ databeredskab på forsknings- og innovationsområdet. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse. Videnskabelig rapport fra Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse (CFA) https://doi.org/10.7146/cfasr.v16i1.156126
Fishberg, R. (2023). Inequality beyond representation in European research funding. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/11/27/inequality-beyond-representation-in-european-research-funding/
de Ridder, J., Bouter, L., Haven, T., Peels, R., Tijdink, J. & Zeegers, M. P. (2023). In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder. Accountability in Research, 30(5), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599
Andersen, J. P. & P.J.M. Horbach , S. (2024). If AI is an accelerator, will research need speed limits? https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-views-of-europe-2024-12-if-ai-is-an-accelerator-will-research-need-speed-limits/
Andersen, J. P. (2023). Hvordan motiverer man ligestilling? Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, (2), 131-132. https://doi.org/10.7146/KKF.V34I1.136106
Stage, A. K., Norn, M.-T. & Bloch, C. W. (2023). Hvordan finansierer man forskning, der skal løse samfundsudfordringer? Forskningspolitikk, 03/2023, 27-29. https://www.fpol.no/hvordan-finansierer-man-forskning-der-skal-lose-samfundsudfordringer/
Laudel, G., Thomas, D. A. & Ramos-Vielba, I. (2022). Hunting or gathering; feasting or starving? Researcher funding acquisition practices in differing funding landscapes. Afhandling præsenteret på Building capacity and promoting resilience in research systems, Stockholm, Sverige.
Bührer, S., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Rigler, D. & Palmén, R. (2021). How to Implement Context-Sensitive Evaluation Approaches in Countries with still Emerging Evaluation Cultures. Public Policy and Administration, 20(3), 368-381. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.20.3.28371
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2021, feb. 10). How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/02/10/how-the-pandemic-changed-editorial-peer-review-and-why-we-should-wonder-whether-thats-desirable/
Aagaard, K., Norn, M. T. & Stage, A. K. (2022). How mission-driven policies challenge traditional research funding systems. F1000Research, Artikel 949. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123367.1
Thomas, D. A. (2022). How actor arrangements affect experience in SSH knowledge transfer funding: Contrasting Sweden's FLEXIT with UK KTPs. Afhandling præsenteret på Building capacity and promoting resilience in research systems, Stockholm, Sverige.
Norn, M. T. & Sigurdardottir, M. S. (2024). How academic leaders respond to the growing importance of external research funding and what this means for universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 30(3), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-024-09143-4
Losi, L. F. (2024). Hidden Engagements: Exploring Europeans’ Public (Dis)Engagement with Science. [Ph.d.-afhandling, Aarhus Universitet]. Forlaget Politica. https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/Afhandlinger/lucilla_losi.pdf
Bloch, C. W. (2020). Heterogeneous impacts of research grant funding. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 456-468. Artikel rvaa025. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa025
Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Waltman, L., Haustein, S., Sabé, M., Solmi, M., Stephen, D., Schniedermann, A., Willemin, S., Gauffriau, M., Andersen, J. P., Bornmann, L., Costas, R., Glänzel, W., Hinze, S., Robinson-Garcia, N., Sivertsen, G. ... Moher, D. (2025). Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A Two-Round Modified Delphi Study. I 20th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (s. 1-25) https://doi.org/10.51408/issi2025_069
Nielsen, M. W. & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 118(7), Artikel e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118
Aagaard, K., Mongeon, P., Ramos-Vielba, I. & Thomas, D. A. (2020). Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tg6vn
Aagaard, K., Mongeon, P., Ramos-Vielba, I. & Thomas, D. A. (2021). Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLoS One, 16(5), Artikel e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488
Andersen, J. P., Degn, L., Fishberg, R., Graversen, E. K., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Schneider, J. W. & Sørensen, M. P. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – a survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/83whe
Andersen, J. P., Degn, L., Fishberg, R., Graversen, E. K., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Schneider, J. W. & Sørensen, M. P. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – a survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions. Technology in Society, 81(June 2025), Artikel 102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102813
Karydou, K., Tzanakou, C., Nakic, A. & Kalpazidou Schmidt, E. (2025). Generative AI as a Feminist Critical - but not neutral - Friend. Abstract fra 18th EDI Conference 2025 Athens, Athens.
Madsen, E. B., Mongeon, P. & Schneider, J. W. (2025). Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment. Quantitative Science Studies, 6, 774-795. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.5
Bloch, C. W., Eklund, C. M. & Van Criekingen, K. (2021). Gender balance and productivity (D5.6). https://globalinto.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/GLOBALINTO_D5.6.pdf
Farčnik, D., Redek, T., Bloch, C., Piekkola, H., Rybalka, M. & Istenič, T. (2024). Gender and age productivity–wage gaps in innovative work. I C. Bloch, A. Protogerou & N. S. Vonortas (red.), Intangible Assets, Productivity and Economic Growth: Micro, Meso and Macro Perspectives (s. 128-149). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324225-7
Vabø, A., Kalpazidou Schmidt, E., Egeland, C. & Franssen, T. (2023). Gender, academic power and citizenship – the impact of international recruitment on gender balance in climate research. BMC Proceedings, 17(Suppl. 15), Artikel A59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-023-00275-w
